Thursday, 6 March 2014

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2 CASE LIST

NATURE OF THE CONSTITUTION

TANADA VS CUENCO

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS VS VILLALUZ

PP VS POMAR

OCCENA VS COMELEC

SANTIAGO VS COMELEC

SANIDAD VS COMELEC


THE CONSTITUTION AND THE COURTS


ACTUAL CONTROVERSY

ABBAS VS COMELEC

CAWALING VS COMELEC

PROPER STANDING

             EXISTENCE OF STANDING

                         MACALINTAL VS. COMELEC

                          KILOSBAYAN VS MORATO


            ABSENCE OF STANDING

                            JOYA VS PCGG

                            IBP VS ZAMORA


PLEADING AT EARLIEST OPPOSTUNITY

TIJAM VS SIBONGHANOY

PEOPLE VS LEACHON


LIS MOTA

MATIBAG VS BENIPAYO

MIRASOL VS CA

NORTON VS SHELBY

TAN VS BARRIOS


BILL OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL POWERS OF THE STATE

A. POLICE POWER

LAWFUL SUBJECT

US VS TORIBIO

taxicab Operators vs. Board of Transportation

SANGGALANG VS. IAC

OBLE VS TORRES

LAWFUL MEANS

YNOT VS IAC



EMINENT DOMAIN

RP VS LA ORDEN

CITY OF MANILA VS CHINESE COMMUNITY

RP VS PLDT

PHIL PRESS VS. COMELEC


TAKING CASES

AYALA DE ROXAS VS CITY OF MANILA

NAPOCOR VS PADERANGGA

CITY GOVT OF QC VS. ERICTA


PUBLIC USE: CHOICE OF PROPERTY CASES

PROVINCE OF CAMSUR VS. CA

KNECHT VS CA

ARDONA VS CA

MANOSCA VS CA

SUMULONG VS GUERRERO

JUST COMPENSATION, DETERMINATION, FORM: CASES

EXPORT PROCESSING ZONE VS. DULAY

NAPOCOR VS HENSON

ASSOCIATION OF SMALL LANDOWNERS IN THE PHILS VS SEC OF AGRARIAN REFORM

VELARMA VS CA



TAXATION


EQUAL PROTECTION AND TAXATION, UNIFORMITY OF TAXATION

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS LINGAYEN

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. CA

PROGRESSIVE OF TAXATION

TOLENTINO VS SECREARY OF FINANCE

DOUBLE TAXATION

PUNSALAN VS MUNICIPAL BOARD OF MANILA

TAX EXEMPTION CASE

LLADOC VS CIR

CIR VS CA

CHAVEZ VS PCGG



DUE PROCESS OF LAW

SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CASES

VALID EXERCISE

SAND VS. ABAD SANTOS

SAMSON VS MAYOR OF CITY OF BACOLOD

AGUSTIN VS EDU


VIOLATION OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS


LUPANGCO VS. CA

NATL DEVT COMPANY VS PHIL VETERANS


QUESTION OF VAGUENESS

PP. VS DEA PEIDRA


TANADA VS TUVERA


PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS

REQUIREMENT OF NOTICE OF HEARING

EXISTENCE OF VIOLATION








1 comment:

  1. To pass the competitive exam, it is important to learn how to solve the questions correctly and also practice to improve the time required for attempting maximum questions. For my Bar exam, I am practicing using previous papers. Have done all my preparations using one of the Mobile Bar Review Courses online. I am sure I would be passing the test with the help of this course.

    ReplyDelete